Effective
Recruitment Practices
This is not an exhaustive article on Recruitment
Practices. In this article I am trying to highlight my experience and certain
observations to make Recruitment process and Role of BUHR more effective.

Today
in many organizations Talent Acquisition is a separate function and specialized
people takes care of this activity in the organization.
This
was the need of the hour in Mid-size to Large organizations as HR Generalist
was finding it to difficult to take care of all activities. It is very
important to devotee quality time and to have mature process to get right
talent, then just running behind numbers and closures of the position.
As
the recruitment process got separated from the role of HR Generalist, a new
role got formed as of Business HR. But with my experience, Business HR role cannot
be a success, unless the person is having great amount of exposure and
knowledge of other functions of HR, such as, Talent Acquisition, Compensation
& Benefits and Legal & Statutory Compliance.
As a
Business HR, to be effective in your role, one should know, what is the status
of the Recruitment in his/her Business Unit (BU) and should closely monitor
the status of it. How the Resource Management is happening (Allocation, Deployment and Redeployment)
BUHR
should be a part of meetings associated with Recruitment, Resources management
and should conduct meetings periodically with C&B team as well as legal
team to understand status, needs and how BUHR can contribute in all these
activities.
To
be effective in role of BUHR, it is very important to have clear knowledge and
updates on various HR & Project related activities, else you will not
perform role of BUHR, but will be a coordinator, passing and seeking
information from various groups/departments in the organization.
Be
accountable and responsible towards your work and take keen interest in other
areas as well to become an effective contributor in your role at organizational
level.
Right
talent leads to the success of business. Sourcing of resume is the first thing
recruiter does, once the hiring activity starts. I personally do not want my
people wasting too much of time in sourcing resumes, as most of the candidates
(with no offence to anyone) today copy paste things from there colleagues
resume. But screening and sourcing is also important, but avoid wasting too
much time on these activities.
Psychometric
Testing: Is it really helps in Recruiting Right Candidates?
I
think any online psychometric test will not help you understand candidate than
personal interview with him. Western world have stopped conducting psychometric
test and they more rely on Personal Interviews.
Psychometric
testing is one of the tools of psychology and I strongly recommend other tool
of psychology and that is Personal Interview. Nothing is more important than
taking right candidates, if companies are relying on psychometric test to save
time (this answer I got from lot of colleagues) they are sadly on the wrong
track, rather I recommend spending more time in personal interview with the
candidate.
Right
way to judge candidate is by asking questions, the best way to check
candidate’s ability of decision making, leadership, team management, team
player is by creating artificial scenarios or asking question related to
situations happened in the organizations, role plays will also help in this.
Till the time you are not convinced with the benefits of psychometric test
please do not go with it and definitely it is not a time saving tool.
Have
Discussion and create strategies
As a
HR interviewer, please do not form first impressions and avoid halo effect. As
a HR interviewer you should understand the requirements of the position from
the hiring manager. In my experience I have seen that, there is a very less
communication/discussion happening between hiring manager, recruiter and HR
interviewer. How this communication gap is going to help to get right
candidates?
It
is very important to understand how this position is going to grow in the
organization and in project. If the position is very technical with minimum or
no interaction with clients, is it right to have same weight age for
communication skills what we have for position where interaction with people,
client is more.
To
understand this and other aspects of the position, it is very important to have
a discussion between people conducting different levels of interviews and
sourcing team. So that we get right people and can provide opportunities to
people who are not very fluent in English communication but are technically far
superior.
As a
HR interviewer, we cannot judge all candidates applying for different positions
on same behavioral parameters; I have seen many HR interviewers trying very
hard to evaluate candidates on all behavioral parameters mentioned in the
evaluation sheet, resulting into asking not suitable question to the candidate
and loosing effectiveness. To avoid this please have a well planned strategy
right from creating Job Descriptions and specification, sourcing to the closure
of positions by conducting different levels of interviews.
This
will help you to be effective during interview process and to get right talent.
No comments:
Post a Comment